Friday, August 31, 2007
How Pandora Mimics The Worst Aspect of Cable's Music Choice
My main peeve with Music Choice's screen display is in how it provides basic song/album data. Its practice is to assign a song to an album on which it recently appeared, and its corresponding year of release. Such info is helpful if I want to walk down to the nearest Sam Goody and pick up the compact disc, but it doesn't convey the track's history. Here's a Music Choice example: while playing "Good Vibrations" it will show the album "Best of the Beach Boys (2002)." True enough--but when was the song recorded?
Many music fans like myself want to know when a track was recorded, and on what 'product' it first appeared (a single, EP, album, soundtrack). It is understood that over time, a track will be remixed, remastered, and appear on new compilations. We are told that we are in a "post-album" era. All the more reason to not assign a track to a random compilation or re-release--unless you give the full history. Since Music Choice is unmarried to commerce--not only does it lack commericials, but it has no means to 'click and purchase,' then you would think it would want to share History of the Track (and since it shares so much random artist info, i.e. "The Hart sisters ran a lemonade stand in Tennesse as pre-teens").
The web offers ample space to provide a full History of a track, and to list all available methods to purchase the track. iTunes does a good job of listing the many variations of a song, per release. (Search for 'Walk the Line')
Pandora does not.
Pandora is an excellent free web radio service that combines scientifically-inspired music research ("the music genome project") with personal preferences to play songs it thinks you will like. For all the work it does in correlating and suggesting similar tracks, it lacks track history. Odd, because even on a per track basis, it offers a lot of information: a Review, a list of attributes, a link to Band Bio. Somewhere it forgot to offer Track history. It should nail down the meanings of "Recording" "Track" "song" "cut" "mixed" and "record" "album" so that we know what we are learning and seeking info about.
The standard measurement, from which the others relate, would be 'track.' That way, Pandora could state:
"This track (Good Vibrations) was cut (mixed down to record) May 1966 (based on various recording sessions).
"It first appeared as a single May 1966."
"The first album on which it appeared: 'Smiley Smile', which is offered by Capitol as a 2fer ("Smiley Smile/Wild Honey") (note: that info is relevant only to offline shoppers, unless you're interested in record company packagings...although, those re-releases often coincide with remastering).
"This version is a stereo remix released 1990, when full album was remastered."
"You can purchase this version online via ...."
"You can purchase other mixes of this song,(click ->)."
"Other bands that have recorded this song include..."
"To view other recordings of this song..."
Whew. Lot of info... TMI? Welp, that's what the Internet offers. If one requests it ("More Info" link) one should be able to obtain this depth of info.
Now, in Part II I will explore the Pandora's limitations in seeking to assign each track to an album.
Wednesday, August 29, 2007
YouTube Full Screen View Means Re-Start
I would say that these buttons are not self-evident.
When you do go to full screen mode, a message overlays the video player: "Click ESC to exit Full Screen Mode." That is helpful information. Why then, not have a similar Text prompt, when in Regular mode?
"Click (x) to go to Full Screen Mode."
It would help. The bigger issue to address, re. Full Screen Mode, is that it returns the Playback cursor to the Beginning of the video. Why? Windows Media Player has for many years offered the 'Full Screen' method (also via iconography) which continues to play the video. Can't the Google Gang at least match that work from Redmond?
YouTube: As awesome as your awesome tools are, can you please make some tweaks that would enable users to easily find the way to Full Screen, and when they do so, to not have to restart the movie?
Friday, August 10, 2007
The Soft Terrorism of Tunnel Stoppages
The usability of our cities' bridges, tunnels, and subways is compromised when any and all users are granted a veto to shut down the system. Authorities must prevent abuse of the veto and screen perpetrators for potential to cause greater harm to the people and infrastructure.
****
Terrorists need not cause fatalities, only anger borne of inconvenience. It is possible that Al Queda has targeted bridges and tunnels in
The Lincoln Tunnel, which connects
A car need not be broken to cause a roadblock. "Disabled" is only one of several explanations for an immobile car. There has to be a rewording of the situation. The media and the authorities are not only guilty of reporting too little; they report assumptions. We would all have a better sense of what is going on if the media and police discovered and reported on discovery. Just the facts, please.
Wrong: (present phrasing): Traffic is delayed 40 minutes in the Lincoln Tunnel due to a disabled vehicle.
More Accurate: Traffic is delayed 40 minutes in the Lincoln Tunnel because a vehicle in the right lane is not moving.
Most Accurate: Traffic is delayed 40 minutes in the Lincoln Tunnel because a vehicle in the right lane is not moving. The driver has cut off the engine and abandoned the vehicle.
The authorities must not jump to conclusions, prematurely exclude possibilities, or conceal specifics. We can not ignore the possibility that some people, for whatever reason, get a kick out of causing havoc with our roadways.
When a given action is neither difficult to execute nor punishable, then an actor, if he desires, will indulge in it repeatedly. The insurance industry calls such situations as causing a "moral hazard" of overuse. The simple action of deserting a car causes inordinate suffering to a city. The Port Authority of New York/New Jersey should investigate who is behind these disabled vehicles, and whether a punishment should be levied that would deter future occurrences. In short, the police must catch the perpetrators and be able to levy fines based on the degree of fault by the driver, and the resulting community inconvenience.